Cassie Ventura’s testimony in Sean “Diddy” Combs’ federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial has brought renewed attention to the complexities of consent and the legal avenues available to survivors of sexual abuse. Although Ms. Ventura settled her civil lawsuit against Mr. Combs for $20 million in November 2023, her detailed accounts during the ongoing criminal proceedings have shed light on the challenges survivors face when confronting abuse, especially in situations involving significant power imbalances.
During her four-day testimony in May 2025, Ventura described an 11-year relationship with Combs characterized by manipulation, violence, and control. She recounted being coerced into drug-fueled sexual encounters, referred to as “freak-offs,” and how Combs used threats, including the release of explicit videos, to maintain his dominance. Ms. Ventura felt compelled to comply with Mr. Combs’ sexual demands because Mr. Combs fully controlled Ventura’s music career.
In legal terms, consent obtained through coercion, manipulation, or fear is not valid. Such scenarios can constitute quid pro quo sexual harassment, where employment decisions or benefits are contingent upon the acceptance of unwelcome sexual advances or conduct. These dynamics often occur between supervisors and subordinates in the workplace. Even relationships that begin consensually can evolve into nonconsensual situations if one party leverages their authority to demand sexual favors in exchange for professional advancement.
Ms. Ventura’s courage to testify against Mr. Combs has inspired other survivors to share their stories, prompting a broader examination of the systems that enable abuse and the potential legal recourse in such situations. As the trial continues, Ms. Ventura’s testimony serves as a reminder regarding the importance of understanding consent, supporting survivors, and holding perpetrators accountable.
Legal Recourse for Survivors of Sexual Assault in New York City
Survivors of sexual assault in New York City have several civil legal avenues to seek justice and compensation:
- New York State Human Rights Law (NYSHRL): This law prohibits employers from discriminating against employees based on sex, gender identity, and other protected characteristics.
- New York State Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) 213-c: This law provides that survivors of specific sexual offenses may commence a civil lawsuit within twenty years of the alleged incident.
- New York City Human Rights Law (NYCHRL): Offering even broader protections than the state law, the NYCHRL covers all employers in New York City, regardless of size.
- Gender-Motivated Violence Act (GMVA): The GMVA provides a civil cause of action for individuals who have been victims of crimes of violence motivated by gender, such as sexual assault or domestic violence.
- The New York Common Law: Survivors of sexual misconduct may also pursue civil claims for assault and battery, which are intentional torts distinct from criminal charges.
If you or someone you know has experienced sexual harassment, please contact the author, Christine Hintze. Consulting with an experienced sexual harassment attorney can help navigate the complexities of these laws and determine the best course of action for your specific situation.
Christine Hintze is a seasoned attorney who regularly represents survivors of sexual assault and harassment. Throughout her career, Christine has successfully advocated for clients across various levels of the corporate hierarchy, from entry-level associates to C-suite executives, across a wide variety of industries including prominent financial institutions. In the past year alone, she has secured over $6 million in settlements for her clients in cases involving sexual harassment and assault. Christine is dedicated to empowering survivors and holding institutions accountable, providing compassionate and effective legal representation to those seeking justice.